Link

by David Sheldon

August 27th, 2017 – New Petition Aimed at Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette Asks Him to Enforce Existing Laws Against ‘Smart’ Meters.

We are calling on all of you who have issues with smart meters – whether it be for privacy violations, health violations or reckless disregard for our safety from lightning and fires – to join our NEW PETITION TO MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE. He is our state’s chief law enforcer and he has so far ignored the Fourth Amendment violations, Michigan’s own felony surveillance statute, and a state law mandating that utilities deliver safe energy. He has stood idly by while senior citizens have their electricity shut off for resisting this new technology – even when they have doctor’s letters and their very lives are placed at risk.

This man is reportedly planning to run in the Republican primary as the party’s next candidate for Governor. Let’s let him know he won’t have our support if he continues to fiddle while Michiganders suffer!

Here is the petition, started by John Kurczewski: Click Here

Link

Stopping Federal AbusesSmart Meters Are Only One Example of Federal Abuses!
by Vigilant Dave

(photo at right courtesy of ratch0013 at freedigitalphotos.net)

Michigan Stop Smart Meters is non-partisan. We do not endorse political parties or candidates for office. In order to build the broadest possible coalition, we do not usually get involved in issues other than smart meters. But we have seen so many examples of a growing federal tyranny in this country, of violation of our rights as citizens, of unconstitutional acts of our government, that it is impossible to remain silent about the overall trend of these matters.

Our federal government now boldly asserts the right to spy on ALL the communications of ALL of us, and to lock any of us up indefinitely without charges or a trial. Can it be any great surprise then that they now also assert the right to spy on us in our homes, to control our appliances and even to make many of us sick in the process? There is a pattern to all this. What we are learning is that elections make no difference to the long run trends. We are learning that, all too often, people spend thousands of dollars fighting injustices in courts, only to have their lawsuits thrown out by system loyal judges on the flimsiest of pretexts. We are learning that powerful interests really control this country and NOT the leaders we thought we were putting in power with the last election.

Smart meters are just one facet of this. This is a federal program with our federal tax dollars being used, in effect, to bribe utility companies and state regulators. The rights of individual utility customers are being trashed. Legislators, Attorney Generals and courts are choosing to maintain the “system” rather than to defend the citizens. Happily there are a few exceptions now and then as when the Michigan House Oversight Committee, under the leadership of now retired Rep. Tom McMillin, held a four hour hearing where most of us got a chance to voice our protests on the smart meter issue. Still, we have to wonder what will come of that hearing. After all, McMillin’s committee heard our grievances only after the House Energy and Technology Committee refused to do so. Is there going to be any desire in the new legislative term to follow through with a meaningful new law? Or is it going to be business as usual with our elected state lawmakers being manipulated by powerful corporations and by an all-powerful federal government?

More and more we are going to have to see the broader picture of which smart meters are only one part. We are going to have to find the will, the courage and the means to challenge a federal government that is out of control. We can’t do that by “voting the bums out”. We have seen over and over that doesn’t work. We only get new bums. And we have seen over and over that the federal court system does not check federal abuses.

Is there an answer? We think there is, and we can do no better than to recommend the work of the Tenth Amendment Center and heartily endorse their program for taking back our country:

 A Ten-Step Program for Constitutional Recovery
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2014/12/31/a-ten-step-program-for-constitutional-recovery/

 

Link

(Revised 03/12/15)

NEW: At the end of the legislative session (December 2014) all testimony submitted in 2014 was moved to an archive page. We now have the link to that page: <More>

About 200 people showed up for the December 2nd, 2014 smart meter hearing before the Michigan House Oversight Committee chaired by Tom McMillin.  72 of these filled out cards to speak.  Everyone who spoke, except for the corporate people and MPSC people, was against the new

Laurie Eboff-Milford meters. At least 45 submitted written evidence for the record that may be viewed by the public (see below).

Rep McMillin asked very astute and probing questions when the representatives of DTE, Consumers and MPSC were making their statements. The hearing did not get under way until 5:30 but continued to nearly 10 pm.

Earlier in the day there had been large demonstrations on the Capitol steps and many had participated in having the Sergeant-At-Arms call out their elected representative from the Senate and

Demonstration at state capitolHouse sessions to discuss with them the smart meter issues. Many who participated earlier were not able to attend the hearing due to the late starting time. The total number participating in the day’s events may well have reached 300.

A preliminary transcript of the hearing should be posted on the Committee’s web page soon. Those of us who participated believe this hearing will serve as a catalyst to get a smart meter bill passed in the next legislative session.

Bloomfield Twp Supervisor and Kathy

A  video (youtube) of the entire hearing can be seen now by following the two links below.

Click here for Part 1 (2 hours)

Click here for Part 2 (2 hours)

For your convenience, near the end of Part 1 a link appears on screen that will load Part 2.

NEW: Click here to access the written evidence submitted

The above link will take you to the Oversight Committee page, where you scroll down to where there is a box that says “Testimony” and “Select One”. Clicking on the down arrow next to “Select One” will display a drop down list of all the people that submitted evidence (with the exception of a few folks who submitted evidence that was too massive to scan).  Clicking on a name from this list will display that person’s submitted evidence.

Note also there is a box with a drop down list where you can select and view the minutes for any meeting of this Committee.  At this time, however, only the proposed  minutes of a very short meeting that happened earlier in the day on December 2nd are up for viewing.  We are hopeful that the proposed minutes of the much longer smart meter hearing will be up within the next few days.

 

Link

February 28th, 2012 – Representative Paul Opsommer (R) of Dewitt introduced today a bill in the Michigan House, HR 5439, to allow utility consumers to opt out of “advanced meters” otherwise known as ‘smart’ photo of Michigan Capitol buildingmeters.  This bill, like the McMillin bill before, has been referred to the House Energy Committee.  If either bill passes we will have reached a real landmark in our fight against an abusive technology.

This latest bill does go even further than the first one to protect us:

  • Respect for community moratoriums.
  • Utility requested to remove an ‘advanced meter’ must do so within 15 days
  • Compromise on fees:  A $50 removal fee – but only if there had been previous consent by present or previous owner.  No ongoing monthly fees for opting out!
  • Utility may not offer a discount or rebate to anyone for accepting an advanced meter.
  • Except where customer explicitly requests an “advanced meter”, the utility must send letter out 6 months prior to install explaining what an “advanced meter” is and explaining opt-out procedure.
  • Where customer has formally requested opt-out, utility must acknowledge in writing.
  • Covers municipal energy utilities as well as those regulated by MPSC.
  • Customer may opt-out of later generation advanced meter even if first generation one was accepted.
  • Advanced meter data transmissions must be encrypted and may not contain the customer’s name or address.  Only a customer identifier number is allowed.
  • Customer data may not be posted on internet except with a secure protocol and a password.
  • Customer data may not be given to law enforcement except under court supervision.
  • Shutoffs shall require an in person visit at least 48 hours in advance to verify address.
  • Secure system and audits by Commission concerning shutoff procedures.

There are only two provisions we can think of that we would like to see added to this bill.  One would be to redefine “advanced meter” to include any meter that is capable of recording and storing usage in intervals of an hour or less, can act as a gateway between appliances in a home and the utility and also has two way real time communication with the utility to support demand-response programs.

While wireless radio transmissions are one of the major objections to the present variety of ‘smart’ meter, such wireless communication should not be viewed as an essential or defining attribute of a ‘smart meter’.  After all, in some other nations, all the objectives of a smart meter program have been achieved by fiber optic or other hard-wired means.  The definition matters if consumers are to be protected from ALL violations of their privacy and Fourth Amendment rights.  No utility customer should ever be forced to accept a meter that is a surveillance device but sends the customer data over a phone line or over the power line itself.

The other provision we would like is a strong community opt-out.  It is not clear if the community moratorium provision in this bill would afford more than temporary protection.  Any city or township should be able to enact a zoning ordinance that would establish certain safe zones for those citizens who are concerned about the possible long term health effects of being bombarded 24/7 with radio waves from their neighbors meters as well as their own.  Individual opt-out alone won’t be enough to save the health of susceptible individuals.

Read the full text of the Opsommer bill by clicking here.

Link

February 16th, 2012 – Representative Tom McMillin (R) of Rochester introduced today, along with 8 co-sponsors, proposed smart meter opt-out legislation in the Michigan House of Representatives.  The bill, known as H.B. 5411, contains a whole series of prohibitions against the electric utility companies of the state with regard to what are termed “advanced meters” and directs the Michigan Public Services Commission (MPSC) to enforce these prohibitions.

The bill prohibits any such utility from (a) requiring a customer to accept an “advanced meter”, (b) from refusing to remove one if already installed, or (c) from “imposing any disincentive on a customer for not accepting the installation or use of an ‘advanced meter’.”

For those customers who do accept an “advanced meter”, the bill would prohibit the utility from collecting data from the meter more often than once per month “unless requested by the customer”, and would further prohibit the giving of “any meter use data from an advanced meter to any person other than the utility.”

The bill has been referred to the Energy and Technology Committee.  We are hopeful the Committee will, after due consideration, forward this bill to the full House for an up or down vote.  If the bill should survive all hurdles and become law, we think some powerful protections will have been put in place to protect the property rights and the Fourth Amendment privacy rights of Michigan homeowners.  We very much appreciate the effort Tom McMillin has put forward to get this bill drafted and to muster the support of so many of his colleagues to co-sponsor.

A provision we would very much like to have seen in this bill would be a “community opt-out” as well as an individual opt-out, at least for those communities where smart meters have not already been installed.  The issue is that an individual who opts out only gains partial protection from the possible electro magnetic effects upon his or her health.  He is still immersed in a sea of such radio radiation produced by all the smart meters of his immediate neighbors.  Only a community opt-out, or a statewide ban, would provide real protection against layering more and more radiation on homes that are already bombarded with radio and tv signals, cell phone tower radiation, and WiFi radiation from all the homes in the area.

Two other provisions we don’t see in the bill are a mandate that the MPSC conduct a proper investigation of the health effects of the meters, or a moratorium on further installs pending the results of such an investigation.  We know that the current investigation by MPSC has, despite the pleas of nine city governments, been designed to exclude health effects and to make no provision for halting or slowing ongoing installations.

The bill defines what “advanced meter” means.  We would like to have seen a definition that would encompass all the variations of ‘smart’ metering that a utility might install – so that the utility not be able to escape the requirements of this proposed law just by, for example, turning off the radio feature, while still tracking granular usage data to be uploaded by different means.  We are recommending that a definition be made that is more along the lines of that published by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

Still this bill is a start – a big first step.  Our hats are off to Rep. McMillin and his eight Republican colleagues who co-sponsored.  They seem to have focused on the property rights and Fourth Amendment issues. We do not see smart meters as a partisan issue, however, and would hope that Democrats in the House might introduce their own proposal that would broaden the final legislation to include more focus on the health effects and possible remedies for that.

To read the actual proposed legislation, click here.